| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9629.1302879429@localhost>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:57:09 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: mmotm 2011-04-14 - lockdep splats in sched.c during boot
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:08:47 PDT, akpm@...ux-foundation.org said:
> The mm-of-the-moment snapshot 2011-04-14-15-08 has been uploaded to
>
> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/mmotm/
This throws at least two complaints about lockdep on the way up. I've had
several complete hangs as well last night during boot following a WARN in
sched.c, but didn't have netconsole or a camera handy at the time. Will follow up if I
catch one. Both whinges point at a 'for_each_domain()'. Not sure why I
haven't seen mention on lkml before - what am I doing different?
Splat number 1:
[ 0.044382] smpboot cpu 1: start_ip = 99000
[ 0.002999] calibrate_delay_direct() timer_rate_max=2526877 timer_rate_min=2526840 pre_start=520283431585 pre_end=520308700132
[ 0.002999] calibrate_delay_direct() timer_rate_max=2526857 timer_rate_min=2526829 pre_start=520313753438 pre_end=520339021871
[ 0.002999] calibrate_delay_direct() timer_rate_max=2526851 timer_rate_min=2526824 pre_start=520344075709 pre_end=520369344094
[ 0.002999] calibrate_delay_direct() timer_rate_max=2526862 timer_rate_min=2526834 pre_start=520374397819 pre_end=520399666308
[ 0.002999] calibrate_delay_direct() timer_rate_max=2526864 timer_rate_min=2526836 pre_start=520404719957 pre_end=520429988465
[ 0.116010]
[ 0.116011] ===================================================
[ 0.116989] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 0.116989] ---------------------------------------------------
[ 0.116989] kernel/sched.c:2426 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
[ 0.116989]
[ 0.116989] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 0.116989]
[ 0.116989]
[ 0.116989] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 0.116989] 2 locks held by swapper/1:
[ 0.116989] #0: (cpu_add_remove_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810394d2>] cpu_maps_update_begin+0x12/0x14
[ 0.116989] #1: (&p->pi_lock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffff81032959>] try_to_wake_up+0x29/0x1aa
[ 0.116989]
[ 0.116989] stack backtrace:
[ 0.116989] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-rc3-mmotm0414 #1
[ 0.116989] Call Trace:
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81065bfc>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9b/0xa4
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff8102acd0>] ttwu_stat+0xcc/0xf5
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81032ab5>] try_to_wake_up+0x185/0x1aa
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b5540a>] ? migration_call+0x9e/0xd0
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81564643>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x46/0x80
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81032b06>] wake_up_process+0x10/0x12
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b56207>] cpu_stop_cpu_callback+0xe5/0x11b
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81567abe>] notifier_call_chain+0x54/0x81
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff810596bc>] __raw_notifier_call_chain+0x9/0xb
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff815434d1>] __cpu_notify+0x1b/0x2d
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b55709>] _cpu_up.constprop.0+0xd1/0xe5
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b55757>] cpu_up+0x3a/0x47
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b2f3d2>] smp_init+0x41/0x93
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b1dbc5>] kernel_init+0x9d/0x15b
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff8156bb94>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81564d84>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff81b1db28>] ? start_kernel+0x394/0x394
[ 0.116989] [<ffffffff8156bb90>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb
[ 0.117089] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter.
[ 0.119006] Brought up 2 CPUs
Splat number 2:
[ 1.179319] netconsole: remote ethernet address 00:b0:d0:c3:bd:a7
[ 1.179430] netconsole: device eth0 not up yet, forcing it
[ 1.247705] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 1.298111] e1000e 0000:00:19.0: irq 46 for MSI/MSI-X
[ 1.298312]
[ 1.298313] ===================================================
[ 1.298516] [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
[ 1.298623] ---------------------------------------------------
[ 1.298731] kernel/sched.c:1211 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
[ 1.298858]
[ 1.298858] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1.298859]
[ 1.299152]
[ 1.299152] rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
[ 1.299294] 1 lock held by swapper/0:
[ 1.299294] #0: (&(&base->lock)->rlock){-.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff810443fd>] lock_timer_base+0x49/0x92
[ 1.299294]
[ 1.299294] stack backtrace:
[ 1.299294] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.39-rc3-mmotm0414 #1
[ 1.299294] Call Trace:
[ 1.299294] <IRQ> [<ffffffff81065bfc>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0x9b/0xa4
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff810337a7>] get_nohz_timer_target+0x79/0xbe
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff810452ec>] __mod_timer+0xc7/0x16d
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff810454bf>] mod_timer+0x87/0x8e
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff8130814c>] e1000_intr_msi+0xa2/0xef
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff8108acab>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0xba/0x29f
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff8108aecc>] handle_irq_event+0x3c/0x5c
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff810193c6>] ? ack_APIC_irq+0x10/0x12
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff8108d197>] handle_edge_irq+0xf4/0x121
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff810031aa>] handle_irq+0x122/0x133
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81002fdf>] do_IRQ+0x48/0xa0
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81564cd3>] common_interrupt+0x13/0x13
[ 1.299294] <EOI> [<ffffffff81008009>] ? default_idle+0x52/0x89
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81008007>] ? default_idle+0x50/0x89
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff8100084c>] cpu_idle+0x87/0x102
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81535587>] rest_init+0xcb/0xd2
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff815354bc>] ? csum_partial_copy_generic+0x16c/0x16c
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81b1db1d>] start_kernel+0x389/0x394
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81b1d29f>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xaf/0xb3
[ 1.299294] [<ffffffff81b1d393>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf0/0xf7
[ 1.309814] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists