[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110415160701.GE7112@esdhcp04044.research.nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:07:01 +0300
From: Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>
To: ext Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, aarcange@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: make read-only accessors take const parameters
On 15/04/11 09:51 -0500, ext Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Phil Carmody wrote:
>
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -353,9 +353,16 @@ static inline struct page *compound_head(struct page *page)
> > return page;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline int page_count(struct page *page)
> > +static inline const struct page *compound_head_ro(const struct page *page)
> > {
> > - return atomic_read(&compound_head(page)->_count);
> > + if (unlikely(PageTail(page)))
> > + return page->first_page;
> > + return page;
> > +}
>
> Can you make compound_head take a const pointer too to avoid this?
Not in C, alas. As it returns what it's given I wouldn't want it to lie
about the type of what it returns, and some of its clients want it to
return something writeable.
The simplest macro would have multiple-evaluation issues:
#define compound_head(page) (PageTail(page) ? (page)->first_page : (page))
Not that there are any clients who would misuse that currently, but setting
traps isn't a good way to make things cleaner.
Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists