[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110415041506.GC29512@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:15:06 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: shaohua.li@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
cl@...ux.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch v3 3/3] percpu_counter: use atomic64 for counter in SMP
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:04:50AM +0800, shaohua.li@...el.com wrote:
> Index: linux/lib/percpu_counter.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/lib/percpu_counter.c 2011-04-14 09:53:04.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux/lib/percpu_counter.c 2011-04-14 10:01:29.000000000 +0800
> @@ -59,13 +59,17 @@ void percpu_counter_set(struct percpu_co
> {
> int cpu;
>
> - spin_lock(&fbc->lock);
> + /*
> + * Don't really need to disable preempt here, just make sure there is
> + * no big latency because of preemption
> + */
> + preempt_disable();
> for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> s32 *pcount = per_cpu_ptr(fbc->counters, cpu);
> *pcount = 0;
> }
> - fbc->count = amount;
> - spin_unlock(&fbc->lock);
> + atomic64_set(&fbc->count, amount);
> + preempt_enable();
Disabling preemption here doesn't make any sense.
percpu_counter_set() inherently requires its users to guarantee that
no other user is modifying the percpu counter.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists