linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.39 Block layer regression was [Bug] Boot hangs with 2.6.39-rc[123]]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DA7E202.4000307@fusionio.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 08:13:22 +0200
From:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Guntsche <mike@...loops.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.39 Block layer regression was [Bug] Boot hangs with  2.6.39-rc[123]]

On 2011-04-15 06:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:25:33PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> What's the thinking there? It looks very confused to me.
> 
> It is.  I sent a patch a couple of days ago to fix it.

Yeah thanks for that, I agree it looks a bit confusing as-is. I'll queue
it up.

>> Now, clearly RAID seems to be involved in the problem? The main thing
>> with that would be that the execution of the requests would tend to
>> generate new requests, that go back on the plug queue. Yes? And the
>> loop in flush_plug_list() means that they all should get flushed out,
>> I assume. But something clearly isn't working, and it does seem to be
>> about the RAID kind of setup. So either they didn't get put on the
>> plug queue, or the task got a new plug (which _wasn't_ flushed).
>>
>> Because we're clearly waiting for some request that hasn't completed.
>> Where in the plug queues would it be hiding?
> 
> There's a thread where Neil explains what the problem with MD is - it
> needs a callback on unplug time to generate e.g. the write intent bitmap
> or as large as possible writes for RAID5.  Jens and Neil have been
> looking into it.

I think we are done, Neil just needs to rebase around the current
for-linus and then we should expedite things in.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/