[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110415091529.GJ1611@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:15:29 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...com>
Cc: "Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
amitgoel <amit.goel@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Armando VISCONTI <armando.visconti@...com>,
Shiraz HASHIM <shiraz.hashim@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: dmaengine: Can we schedule new transfer from dma callback
routine??
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:15:43PM +0530, viresh kumar wrote:
> There is one more issue in the current DW_DMAC driver.
> As most of interrupt processing is done in tasklet, spin_lock_bh() is used
> in almost every routine.
As you can't use spin_lock_bh() from IRQ context (you'll get a lockdep
warning) these need to be converted to being the irqsave versions.
That's probably the easiest fix.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists