[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim5wLnP6eYmKL2VaaSCZmuZ=2TQ7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 21:54:06 +0200
From: Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kbuild: how to cleanly retrieve information compilation about the
last build
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 9:46 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 17:57:23 +0200, Francis Moreau said:
>
>> The user modify a file, then instead of calling 'make' (because he
>> forgets) run the script that send the kernel image through the net on
>> a test machine. Since the user had already compiled the kernel before,
>> the kernel image exists but is outdated.
>
> As I said, this is an example of a broken development environment, or
> possibly a broken developer. :)
>
ok I think you can just ignore that thread now, this and what you said
below is just hmm, not revelant for me and for what I asked for.
>> How can a script detect this case if it doesn't call 'make' in its turn ?
>
> Why do you care about detecting it without calling make? Just go ahead and
> *do* it, if the kernel is up to date it won't take long. With a completely
> cold cache, it takes about 90 seconds on my laptop.
Really, what kind of laptop is it ?
Are you compiling the kernel with just allnoconfig ?
Seriously, I now think that what you say is totaly irrevelant, please
just ignore my question.
--
Francis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists