[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1302942712.2308.3.camel@koala>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:31:52 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Murali Nalajala <mnalajal@...eaurora.org>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dima Zavin <dima@...roid.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd: msm_nand: Add initial msm nand driver support.
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 11:20 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > +#define MSM_NAND_REG(off) (msm_nand_phys + (off))
> > > +
> > > +#define MSM_NAND_FLASH_CMD MSM_NAND_REG(0x0000)
> > > +#define MSM_NAND_ADDR0 MSM_NAND_REG(0x0004)
> > >
> > > Could you please make the macros to take the "struct msm_nand_chip
> > > *chip" argument instead, and store the pase address there. Do not hide
> > > the fact that those macros are actually functions, not constant - this
> > > is error prone.
> > >
> > > Besides, I'm do not know your HW, but if you have several controllers
> > > with various base addresses - your driver won't work.
> >
> > you are correct, we have multiple controllers, which breaks this logic
> > in future.
>
> So then make your macros to accept the base address as an argument
> instead please.
Or better make macros to be constants, and always use something like
base + MSM_NAND_FLASH_CMD - this is the standard approach.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Битюцкий Артём)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists