[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimwbsmQw0Dawz_+LpVf+wU60AbB0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:58:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: add pin biasing and drive mode to gpiolib
2011/4/17 Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
>> + * enum gpio_drive - drive modes for GPIOs (output)
>> + * @GPIO_DRIVE_PUSH_PULL: the GPIO will be driven actively high and low, this
>> + * is the most typical case and is typically achieved with two active
>> + * transistors on the output
>> + * @GPIO_DRIVE_OPEN_DRAIN: the GPIO will be driven with open drain (open
>> + * collector) which means it is usually wired with other output ports
>> + * which are then pulled up with an external resistor
>> + * @GPIO_DRIVE_OPEN_SOURCE: the GPIO will be driven with open drain
>> + * (open emitter) which is the same as open drain mutatis mutandis but
>> + * pulled to ground
>
> How about "off". As I've pointed out at various times some devices have
> GPIO pins that may or may not be connected depending upon what other chip
> logic is doing.
Sure, why not.
> As I've also noted with various other previous suggestions for API
> additions you also need an "unknown" state so that a device can implement
> the methods but indicate for some pins the value is unknown due to
> hardware or firmware limitations.
OK do you want an unknown biasing mode too, or is "floating" enough
of a default to cover that?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists