[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110417233147.GA5176@localhost>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:31:48 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...eler.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] IO-less dirty throttling v7
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 01:44:22AM +0800, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> Il 17/04/2011 11:30, Wu Fengguang ha scritto:
> > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 03:31:54PM +0800, Marco Stornelli wrote:
> >> Il 16/04/2011 15:25, Wu Fengguang ha scritto:
> >>> Andrew,
> >>>
> >>> This revision undergoes a number of simplifications, cleanups and fixes.
> >>> Independent patches are separated out. The core patches (07, 08) now have
> >>> easier to understand changelog. Detailed rationals can be found in patch 08.
> >>>
> >>> In response to the complexity complaints, an introduction document is
> >>> written explaining the rationals, algorithm and visual case studies:
> >>>
> >>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/wfg/writeback/slides/smooth-dirty-throttling.pdf
> >>
> >> It'd be great if you wrote a summary in the kernel documentation.
> >
> > Perhaps not in this stage. That will only frighten people away I'm
> > afraid. The main concerns now are "why the complexities?". People at
> > this time perhaps won't bother looking into any lengthy documents at
> > all.
> >
>
> For the moment ok if you think we are in a not-ready-for-mainline yet.
> But for the final version the documentation would be welcome, maybe with
> the pdf as reference. The documentation is always the last thing but
> it's important! :)
No problem. I hope it still get the chance to get upstreamed :)
Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists