[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110418091959.GA32013@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 05:19:59 -0400
From: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
Btw, I really start to wonder if the request level is the right place
to do this on-stack plugging. Wouldn't it be better to just plug
bios in the on-stack queue? That way we could also stop doing the
special case merging when adding to the plug list, and leave all the
merging / I/O schedule logic in the __make_request path. Probably
not .39 material, but worth a prototype?
Also what this dicussion brought up is that the block layer data
structures are highly confusing. Using a small subset of the
request_queue also for make_request based driver just doesn't make
sense. It seems like we should try to migrate the required state
to struct gendisk, and submit I/O through a block_device_ops.submit
method, leaving the request_queue as an internal abstraction for
the request based drivers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists