[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25B60CDC2F704E4E9D88FFD52780CB4C05CF05B23D@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:49:44 -0700
From: Haojian Zhuang <hzhuang1@...vell.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"haojian.zhuang@...il.com" <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 12/13] regulator: check name in initialization of max8925
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Brown [mailto:broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com]
>Sent: 2011年4月17日 2:02 AM
>To: Haojian Zhuang
>Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com; haojian.zhuang@...il.com; linux-
>kernel@...r.kernel.org; Liam Girdwood
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] regulator: check name in initialization of
>max8925
>
>On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:51:03PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> Check name in initialization of max8925 regulator driver.
>
>> + if (!strcmp(ri->desc.name, pdata->constraints.name))
>> + break;
>
>This isn't a good change - the whole point of the name in the
>constraints is that it allows the user to assign an arbatrary string
>which is useful for the board. The driver should never be looking
>inside the constraints at all, the core will apply the constraints for
>you.
I'll move the name of regulator into regulator_init_data->driver_data.
Thanks
Haojian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists