[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DAC4DEF.3090200@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:42:55 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"yinghai@...nel.org" <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86,xen: introduce x86_init.mapping.pagetable_reserve
On 04/18/2011 07:09 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>
> Sorry, I don't mean to be pushy, it is just that I'll be AFK for 12 days
> starting from next Friday and I think that this issue should really be
> fixed in time for the 2.6.39 release, otherwise no 2.6.39 kernels will
> be able to boot on any xen system.
YOU STILL HAVEN'T PROPOSED ANY SEMANTICS.
The semantics of a hook is a description of what the preconditions are,
what the postconditions are, and what exactly they are allowed or not
allowed to do.
This is a real pain to do, *exactly because hooks are a real pain*.
Most hooks that have been put in has been "oh, just do something at
point X in the code", which is a case of definition by implementation,
which is exactly how we ended up with the current mess.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists