[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303143991.7181.38.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:26:31 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 3/7] lockdep: Annotate read/write states
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 11:45 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Currently the read/write status of a lock while it's acquired is denoted by a
> monotonically increasing variable where:
>
> 0 - WRITE
> 1 - READ
> 2 - RECURSIVE READ
>
> In this patch, we propose to modify this distinction from a monotonically
> increasing variable to a bit mask where:
>
> 0x1 - WRITE
> 0x2 - READ
> 0x4 - RECURSIVE READ
>
> /*
> @@ -286,6 +287,15 @@ extern void lockdep_init_map(struct lock
>
> #define lockdep_set_novalidate_class(lock) \
> lockdep_set_class(lock, &__lockdep_no_validate__)
> +
> +/* lock_state bits */
> +#define _W_ 0
> +#define _R_ (_W_ + 1)
> +#define _RR_ (_W_ + 2)
> +#define _FIRST_RR_ (_W_ + 3)
Eek!!! Please comment these. I hate trying to figure out what RR means.
If I did not read the change log, my first thought was "Round Robin".
Adding something like:
/*
* lock_state bits:
* WRITE
* READ
* RECURSIVE_READ
* FIRST RECURSIVE_READ
*/
Above that would help tremendously. This code is obfuscated enough, we
need many more comments. (I plan on sending out patches to do this too).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists