linux-kernel - Re: [105/105] nfsd4: fix oops on lock failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:59:26 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [105/105] nfsd4: fix oops on lock failure

On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 9:39 AM, OGAWA Hirofumi
<hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
>
> For now, I feel this explain filp leak on my system. the leak is
> increased slowly (filp, cred_jar, and no nfs* slabs), and leak is on
> nfs server side.
>
> I'll start test of this patch, and see what happens.

Can somebody ping/remind me when that is verified - preferably about
_both_ patches, even if it turns out that the first one by Ogawa
wasn't the one that caused the problem?

Or can I just assume that the fix will be in Bruce's pull requests some day?

                         Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/