[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DAC7739.2060100@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:39:05 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: "Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86, gart: Don't enforce GART aperture lower-bound
by alignment
On 04/18/2011 10:36 AM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>>
>> The right thing to do for in-place kexec it to turn it off, not rely on
>> any specific magic addresses. We have had this problem with a number of
>> drivers in the context of kexec.
>
> Ok, so changing the start-address to zero seems the best thing to do.
> This way the GART will working again on machines with less than 512MB of
> RAM (and a BIOS that does not initialize the GART as we want it).
>
I'm going to apply your patch as-is, based on the notion that this is a
change of mechanism, and a change of policy is a separate thing.
However, we should address the shutdown of the GART first, and then we
can move the start address to zero (again, two separate patches.)
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists