[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimaekpwmK+z=ePE+XSP6GUteidwfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:32:43 +0200
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Bug #32982] Kernel locks up a few minutes after boot
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com> wrote:
> On 2011-04-18 20:21, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> a performance regression in the block layer not related to the md
>> issue. If I run a small block IOPS test on a block device created by
>> ib_srp (NOOP scheduler) I see about 11% less IOPS than with 2.6.38.3
>> (155.000 IOPS with 2.6.38.3 and 140.000 IOPS with 2.6.39-rc3+).
>
> That's not good. What's the test case?
Nothing more than a fio IOPS test:
fio --bs=512 --ioengine=libaio --buffered=0 --rw=read --thread
--iodepth=64 --numjobs=2 --loops=10000 --group_reporting --size=1G
--gtod_reduce=1 --name=iops-test --filename=/dev/${dev} --invalidate=1
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists