[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110418212306.GA21154@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:23:06 -0400
From: "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging
> NeilBrown (6):
> md: use new plugging interface for RAID IO.
> md/dm - remove remains of plug_fn callback.
> md - remove old plugging code.
> md: provide generic support for handling unplug callbacks.
> md: incorporate new plugging into raid5.
> md: fix up raid1/raid10 unplugging.
Looking over more of the unplugging left over, is there a reason to
keep the unplug_work bits in CFQ? They seem to rather counter the
current scheme (and it is the last user of kblockd outside of
blk-core.c)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists