lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110418212306.GA21154@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 17:23:06 -0400
From:	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>,
	"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
	"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] block: remove per-queue plugging

> NeilBrown (6):
>       md: use new plugging interface for RAID IO.
>       md/dm - remove remains of plug_fn callback.
>       md - remove old plugging code.
>       md: provide generic support for handling unplug callbacks.
>       md: incorporate new plugging into raid5.
>       md: fix up raid1/raid10 unplugging.

Looking over more of the unplugging left over, is there a reason to
keep the unplug_work bits in CFQ?  They seem to rather counter the
current scheme (and it is the last user of kblockd outside of
blk-core.c)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ