[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110418221051.GR16484@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 00:10:51 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT] Please test rdtsc on various x86-64 hardware (app included)
I tested it on a dual Westmere-EP and a Quad Westmere-EX.
Seems to pass everywhere.
However I kept the default MAX_THREADS 4. Shouldn't that be
increased for the large systems?
I suspect the tests as written didn't really use the large
systems.
Dual:
CPU vendor : GenuineIntel
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5640 ...
CPU stepping : ..
TSC flags : tsc rdtscp constant_tsc nonstop_tsc
Using lfence_rdtsc because you have an Intel CPU
Will test the "lfence;rdtsc" clock.
Now test failed : worst error 48 with 48647928 samples
Load3 test passed: margin 368 with 1013805 samples
Load test passed : margin 368 with 4142659 samples
Store test failed as expected: worst error 2940 with 4298473 samples
Quad:
CPU vendor : GenuineIntel
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7 ...
CPU stepping : ..
TSC flags : tsc rdtscp constant_tsc nonstop_tsc
Using lfence_rdtsc because you have an Intel CPU
Will test the "lfence;rdtsc" clock.
Now test passed : margin 208 with 11997136 samples
Load3 test passed: margin 812 with 98710 samples
Load test passed : margin 208 with 1259451 samples
Store test failed as expected: worst error 9284 with 1086616 samples
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists