[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110418223108.GA5935@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 23:31:08 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: add pin biasing and drive mode to gpiolib
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 08:16:12AM +1000, Ben Nizette wrote:
> On 18/04/2011, at 9:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Even if it ends up being the board code using these APIs it seems
> > sensible to have a standard API that GPIO drivers can use to expose the
> > functionality. This will help with getting control into code Linux owns
> > (since people don't have to implement custom APIs) and will mean we can
> > do things like add control of this for device tree based boards.
> Oh I'm all for platform-specific libraries abstracting this away from the
> board code if that helps, that's certainly the way that, eg, AVR32 does it.
> It just doesn't make sense to me to bounce from the board code in to
> 'generic' gpio code then back to platform-specific implementations when
> you could cut out the middle man.
We have cross platform abstractions for lots of things - device tree,
which I mentioned, is the obvious example - and many of the GPIO
controllers are themselves cross platform as they're for off-SoC chips.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists