[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DAD437E.6090302@kingswood-consulting.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:10:38 +0100
From: Frank Kingswood <frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT] Please test rdtsc on various x86-64 hardware (app included)
On 18/04/11 20:32, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I'd appreciate some help testing rdtsc's ordering wrt memory on
> various hardware. You can download evil-clock-test code at:
>
> https://gitorious.org/linux-test-utils/linux-clock-tests/blobs/raw/master/evil-clock-test.cc
A low power core2 server:
CPU vendor : GenuineIntel
CPU model : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T8100 @ 2.10GHz
CPU stepping : 6
TSC flags : tsc constant_tsc
Using lfence_rdtsc because you have an Intel CPU
Will test the "lfence;rdtsc" clock.
Now test passed : margin 84 with 39213496 samples
Load3 test passed: margin 20947164 with 15 samples
Load test passed : margin 52 with 12466437 samples
Store test failed as expected: worst error 1397 with 11151528 samples
That margin number seemed a bit high, rerunning gives:
CPU vendor : GenuineIntel
CPU model : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T8100 @ 2.10GHz
CPU stepping : 6
TSC flags : tsc constant_tsc
Using lfence_rdtsc because you have an Intel CPU
Will test the "lfence;rdtsc" clock.
Now test passed : margin 84 with 39201440 samples
Load3 test passed: margin 7991 with 15 samples
Load test passed : margin 52 with 12482714 samples
Store test failed as expected: worst error 2457 with 11129294 samples
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists