linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Use empty_iops and empty

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTinysw90tiWhFRmQH_0LWx7o+sD1-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:50:20 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com>
To:	dedekind1@...il.com
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Use empty_iops and empty_fops consistently

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:29 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...glemail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:38 +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> Sorry for having flooded your inbox.
>>
>> That's ok! :-) I think I did not look carefully enough. Your patch is
>> just an additional clean-up which makes the names to be consistent. I
>> can pick it, but probably it is better if it goes in with the
>> 'empty_aops' changes? Whatever you prefer.
>>
>
> I dunno the internal organization between block-tree and fs-sub-tree
> maintainers.
> As I was in contact first with Jens in this issue, it might be a good
> idea to let this patch go through his block-tree.
>
> - Sedat -
>

Hi Artem,

can you take this patch into your UBIFS tree?
Thanks in advance.

- Sedat -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/