lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimZpXAH7uGTDmYJSJJWgX=H5md0JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:18:10 +0900
From:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	lethal@...ux-sh.org, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH 7/9] PM / Runtime: Add generic clock manipulation
 rountines for runtime PM

Hi Rafael,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
>
> Many different platforms and subsystems may want to disable device
> clocks during suspend and enable them during resume which is going to
> be done in a very similar way in all those cases.  For this reason,
> provide generic routines for the manipulation of device clocks during
> suspend and resume.
>
> Convert the ARM shmobile platform to using the new routines.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl>
> ---
>
> Hi,
>
> The previous version of the patch had a build problem for CONFIG_HAVE_CLK
> unset and a the name of pm_runtime_clock_add_notifier() misspelled (a
> couple of times).

Thanks for your work on this. I like that we get closer to a shared code base.

Do you have any plans to add support for multiple clocks per struct
device? I had some plans to play around with that myself, but if we're
moving the code to a common place then this obviously becomes a bit
more complicated.

It's rather common that each hardware block in an SoC is connected to
more than a single clock. This needs to be managed by software
somehow.

So if the plan is to make to the code generic, how about allowing the
architecture to associate clocks with each struct device somehow?

Thanks,

/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ