[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DAD843C.7060409@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 20:46:52 +0800
From: Wanlong Gao <wanlong.gao@...il.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@...lice.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] module: Use the binary search for symbols resolution
2011-4-19 19:35, Rusty Russell wroted:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:44:20 +0800, Wanlong Gao<wanlong.gao@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2011-4-19 9:37, Rusty Russell wroted:
>>> On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:32:08 +0800, Wanlong Gao<wanlong.gao@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> + sym = bsearch(fsa->name, syms->start, syms->stop - syms->start,
>>>> As the bsearch func, why not change the syms->stop to syms->end ?
>>>> Hmm..Just a stupid suggestion.
>>>
>>>
>>> The names are derived from the linker symbols for end of sections, which
>>> is __stop_<sectionname>.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Rusty.
>> As this , why not change the bsearch's "end" to "stop", too ? It will be
>> more readable.
>
> I'm confused. bsearch uses a count, not an end pointer...
>
> Rusty.
Hmm...I see, I see . I made a mistake on this func .
Thanks for your explanation.
Best regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists