[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303218742.7181.96.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 09:12:21 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SystemTap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2.6.39-rc1-tip 15/26] 15: uprobes: Handing int3 and
singlestep exception.
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 15:03 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:05 +0530, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> > + if (unlikely(!utask)) {
> > + utask = add_utask();
> > +
> > + /* Failed to allocate utask for the current task. */
> > + BUG_ON(!utask);
>
> That's not really nice is it ;-) means I can make the kernel go BUG by
> simply applying memory pressure.
Agreed,
None of these patches should have a single BUG_ON(). They all must fail
nicely.
-- Steve
>
> > + utask->state = UTASK_BP_HIT;
> > + }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists