It's probably not sane to return success while redirtying the inode at
the same time in ->write_inode().

CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 fs/nfs/write.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- linux-next.orig/fs/nfs/write.c	2011-04-19 10:18:16.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/nfs/write.c	2011-04-19 10:18:32.000000000 +0800
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ static int nfs_commit_unstable_pages(str
 {
 	struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(inode);
 	int flags = FLUSH_SYNC;
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret = -EAGAIN;
 
 	if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE) {
 		/* Don't commit yet if this is a non-blocking flush and there


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/