linux-kernel - [27/70] xfrm: Refcount destination entry on xfrm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110419201046.036815583@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:08:36 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Timo TerÃ€s <timo.teras@....fi>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [27/70] xfrm: Refcount destination entry on xfrm_lookup

2.6.38-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------


From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>

[ Upstream commit fbd5060875d25f7764fd1c3d35b83a8ed1d88d7b ]

We return a destination entry without refcount if a socket
policy is found in xfrm_lookup. This triggers a warning on
a negative refcount when freeeing this dst entry. So take
a refcount in this case to fix it.

This refcount was forgotten when xfrm changed to cache bundles
instead of policies for outgoing flows.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Acked-by: Timo Teräs <timo.teras@....fi>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1778,6 +1778,8 @@ restart:
 				goto no_transform;
 			}
 
+			dst_hold(&xdst->u.dst);
+
 			spin_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_sk_bundle_lock);
 			xdst->u.dst.next = xfrm_policy_sk_bundles;
 			xfrm_policy_sk_bundles = &xdst->u.dst;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/