lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110419204117.568954682@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:30:46 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: [08/28] ramfs: fix memleak on no-mmu arch

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>

commit b836aec53e2bce71de1d5415313380688c851477 upstream.

On no-mmu arch, there is a memleak during shmem test.  The cause of this
memleak is ramfs_nommu_expand_for_mapping() added page refcount to 2
which makes iput() can't free that pages.

The simple test file is like this:

  int main(void)
  {
	int i;
	key_t k = ftok("/etc", 42);

	for ( i=0; i<100; ++i) {
		int id = shmget(k, 10000, 0644|IPC_CREAT);
		if (id == -1) {
			printf("shmget error\n");
		}
		if(shmctl(id, IPC_RMID, NULL ) == -1) {
			printf("shm  rm error\n");
			return -1;
		}
	}
	printf("run ok...\n");
	return 0;
  }

And the result:

  root:/> free
               total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:         60320        17912        42408            0            0
  -/+ buffers:              17912        42408
  root:/> shmem
  run ok...
  root:/> free
               total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:         60320        19096        41224            0            0
  -/+ buffers:              19096        41224
  root:/> shmem
  run ok...
  root:/> free
               total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:         60320        20296        40024            0            0
  -/+ buffers:              20296        40024
  ...

After this patch the test result is:(no memleak anymore)

  root:/> free
               total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:         60320        16668        43652            0            0
  -/+ buffers:              16668        43652
  root:/> shmem
  run ok...
  root:/> free
               total         used         free       shared      buffers
  Mem:         60320        16668        43652            0            0
  -/+ buffers:              16668        43652

Signed-off-by: Bob Liu <lliubbo@...il.com>
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c
+++ b/fs/ramfs/file-nommu.c
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ int ramfs_nommu_expand_for_mapping(struc
 		SetPageDirty(page);
 
 		unlock_page(page);
+		put_page(page);
 	}
 
 	return 0;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ