[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110419204118.941779217@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 13:30:59 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: [21/28] proc: do proper range check on readdir offset
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
commit d8bdc59f215e62098bc5b4256fd9928bf27053a1 upstream.
Rather than pass in some random truncated offset to the pid-related
functions, check that the offset is in range up-front.
This is just cleanup, the previous commit fixed the real problem.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/proc/base.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2806,11 +2806,16 @@ static int proc_pid_fill_cache(struct fi
/* for the /proc/ directory itself, after non-process stuff has been done */
int proc_pid_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldir)
{
- unsigned int nr = filp->f_pos - FIRST_PROCESS_ENTRY;
- struct task_struct *reaper = get_proc_task(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
+ unsigned int nr;
+ struct task_struct *reaper;
struct tgid_iter iter;
struct pid_namespace *ns;
+ if (filp->f_pos >= PID_MAX_LIMIT + TGID_OFFSET)
+ goto out_no_task;
+ nr = filp->f_pos - FIRST_PROCESS_ENTRY;
+
+ reaper = get_proc_task(filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode);
if (!reaper)
goto out_no_task;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists