[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303249716.11237.26.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:48:36 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to
expand_upwards
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 16:39 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > > I guess DISCONTIGMEM is typically used together with NUMA. Otherwise we
> > > would have run into this before.
> >
> > Which bit of my telling you that six architectures already use it this
> > way did you not get? I'm not really interested in reconciling your
> > theories with how we currently operate. If you want to require NUMA
> > with DISCONTIGMEM, fine, we'll just define SLUB as broken if that's not
> > true ... that will fix my boot panic reports.
>
> Which part of me telling you that you will break lots of other things in
> the core kernel dont you get?
I get that you tell me this ... however, the systems that, according to
you, should be failing to get to boot prompt do, in fact, manage it.
> If you were able to get to a command prompt
> with SLAB then lets all be happy for as long as it lasts.
We can't re-engineer DISCONTIGMEM as a bug fix, so something like this
has to be done for stable regardless.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists