[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110419180919.17971598@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:09:19 -0500
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <john.williams@...alogix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] uio/pdrv_genirq: Add OF support
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:00:18 +0200
"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:08:16AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> > PowerPC and x86 will return 0 for an unassigned IRQ, as will most platforms.
>
> That might be right for these architectures. On ARM SoCs, IRQ0 is often a
> normal irq like any other (e.g. "Audio DMA Controller 1" on Telechips TCC8000).
It's true on at least some powerpc and x86 interrupt controllers as well.
ARM isn't special. :-)
I'm not sure what goes on on x86, as I see a real " 0:" in
/proc/interrupts. But on powerpc, Linux's IRQ numberspace is decoupled
from that of any IRQ controller. This is mainly to accommodate multiple
IRQ controllers with their own numberspaces in the same system; being able
to avoid irq 0 is just a bonus.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists