[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104191620360.4300@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com
cc: gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suhail.ahmed@...el.com, christophe.guerard@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] export kernel call get_task_comm().
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>
>
> This allows drivers who call this function to be compiled modularly.
> Otherwise, a driver who is interested in this type of functionality
> has to implement their own get_task_comm() call, causing code
> duplication in the Linux source tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
There've been some other patchsets proposed recently that need to print a
thread's comm and since /proc/pid/comm can change the comm's of other
threads out from under them, it's necessary to serialize access to it with
task_lock(). This patch certainly makes it easier for modules to do so
correctly, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists