[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110420112020.GA31296@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 05:20:20 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to
expand_upwards
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:34:23AM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> That part makes me think the best option is to make parisc do
> CONFIG_NUMA as well regardless of the historical intent was.
But it's not just parisc. It's six other architectures as well, some
of which aren't even SMP. Does !SMP && NUMA make any kind of sense?
I think really, this is just a giant horrible misunderstanding on the part
of the MM people. There's no reason why an ARM chip with 16MB of memory
at 0 and 16MB of memory at 1GB should be saddled with all the NUMA gunk.
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists