[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110420102314.4604.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:23:35 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to expand_upwards
> On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > > Which part of me telling you that you will break lots of other things in
> > > the core kernel dont you get?
> >
> > I get that you tell me this ... however, the systems that, according to
> > you, should be failing to get to boot prompt do, in fact, manage it.
>
> If you dont use certain subsystems then it may work. Also do you run with
> debuggin on.
>
> The following patch is I think what would be needed to fix it.
I'm worry about this patch. A lot of mm code assume !NUMA systems
only have node 0. Not only SLUB.
I'm not sure why this unfortunate mismatch occur. but I think DISCONTIG
hacks makes less sense. Can we consider parisc turn NUMA on instead?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists