[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104191822440.8047@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 18:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com
cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
suhail.ahmed@...el.com, christophe.guerard@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Intel PTI implementaiton of MIPI 1149.7.
On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> +static void pti_control_frame_built_and_sent(struct pti_masterchannel *mc)
> +{
> + struct pti_masterchannel mccontrol = {.master = CONTROL_ID,
> + .channel = 0};
> + const char *control_format = "%3d %3d %s";
> +
> + char comm[sizeof(current->comm) + 1];
> + u8 control_frame[CONTROL_FRAME_LEN];
> +
> + if (!in_interrupt())
> + get_task_comm(comm, current);
> + else
> + strcpy(comm, "Interrupt");
> +
> + /* Ensure our buffer is zero terminated */
> + comm[sizeof(current->comm)] = 0;
> +
You definitely need to use get_task_comm() here, but that means you can't
allocate char comm[] on the stack with anything but TASK_COMM_LEN, which
is small enough that it shouldn't be an issue. Otherwise there's nothing
protecting sizeof(current->comm) from changing without holding
task_lock(current).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists