linux-kernel - Re: Background memory scrubbing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2011 18:45:06 +0200
From:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	rwhitton@....org, Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Background memory scrubbing

On 2011.04.20 at 17:58 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:46:58PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > BTW is it really necessary to print the following to syslog:
> > 
> > EDAC amd64: pci-read, sdram scrub control value: 15
> > EDAC MC: Read scrub rate: 97650
> > 
> > everytime one runs:
> >  # cat /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/sdram_scrub_rate
> > 97650
> > 
> > ?
> 
> This is KERN_DEBUG since .38 (commit 24f9a7fe3f19f3fd310f556364d01a22911724b3)
> and it shouldn't appear on the console if you don't change your default log level.

Yes. Sorry, but I was referring to dmesg and not the console. 
What I mean is that maybe debugf1 or debugf2 is more appropriate than
amd64_debug?

-- 
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/