linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86, gart: Make sure GART does not map physmem above 1TB

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2011 10:38:28 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...nel.org>
To:	"Roedel, Joerg" <Joerg.Roedel@....com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86, gart: Make sure GART does not map physmem above
 1TB

On 04/19/2011 07:29 AM, Roedel, Joerg wrote:
>>
>> Arguably we call this the k8_nb in other places, so my suggestion would
>> be k8_gart.c
> 
> The k8_nb was renamed to amd_nb recently. The NB is implemented in all
> 64 bit AMD processors and there are more today then K8. The k8_nb was
> historically chosen and misleading today.
> 

OK, fair enough.  However, unless it is actually used in 32-bit mode
calling it amd_gart_64.c is probably better than amd64_gart.c since an
"amd64" processor can also be run in 32-bit mode.

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/