linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] rebuild_sched_domains considered dangerous

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1303336869.2513.26.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:01:09 +1000
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Jesse Larrew <jlarrew@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] rebuild_sched_domains considered dangerous

On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 12:07 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 15:10 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Also, still waiting to hear from the Power7 folks on how often they
> > think to rebuild the topology and how they think that makes sense,
> > afaict Power7 does have actual NUMA nodes unlike s390, so I'm still not
> > seeing how that's going to work properly at all. 
> 
> Jesse care to answer? I hear from Ben you're responsible for that mess.

"responsible for this mess" is a big word :-)

But he's the one to last play with that code ... Jesse ?

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/