linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] mmc: mmc_test: add test for none blocking transfers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTikhaCqW=4BD_h05QebBftVGjGQ3+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2011 09:41:32 +0200
From:	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/12] mmc: mmc_test: add test for none blocking transfers

On 17 April 2011 17:46, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 09:07:04PM +0200, Per Forlin wrote:
> [...]
>> +static int mmc_test_rw_multiple(struct mmc_test_card *test,
>> +                             struct mmc_test_multiple_rw *tdata,
>> +                             unsigned int reqsize, unsigned int size)
>> +{
>> +     unsigned int dev_addr;
>> +     struct mmc_test_area *t = &test->area;
>> +     int ret = 0;
>> +     int max_reqsize = max(t->mem->size_min_cmn *
>> +                           min(t->max_segs, t->mem->cnt), t->max_tfr);
>> +
> The 'max(..., t->max_tfr)' probably should be 'min(..., t->max_tfr)'.
> Otherwise, I see mmc_test failure on my mxs-mmc setup.
>
> mmc0: Test case 37. Write performance with blocking req 4k to 4MB...
> mmc0: Transfer of 64 x 2048 sectors (64 x 1024 KiB) took 5.412563314 seconds (12
> 398 kB/s, 12108 KiB/s, 11.82 IOPS)
> mmc0: Failed to map sg list
> [mmc_test_rw_multiple] error
> mmc0: Result: ERROR (-22)
Thanks for letting me know. I think I should simplify it and use
t->max_tfr only.
I tried to optimize for one of my case when max_tfr is only 1MiB but
mmc request size is 32MiB.

>
> --
> Regards,
> Shawn
Regards,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/