[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110421100639.GC10263@aftab>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 12:06:39 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: "Chumbalkar, Nagananda" <Nagananda.Chumbalkar@...com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
EDAC devel <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, MCE: Do not taint when handling correctable
errors
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 05:58:48AM -0400, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Ok, indeed. Also, in the future, if you take patches from others please also
> credit them in the changelog. Something like this would have been good in the
> current case:
>
> Also, this patch includes a change from Nagananda Chumbalkar as well, which
> drops tainting in the therma throttling code for a similar reason: crossing a
> thermal threshold does not mean corruption.
>
> Nagananda's Acked-by is there so there's at least partial credit - but we
> generally try to aim for at least 100% credit where credit is due :-)
Absolutely, and in the light of recent events :) I'm still not sure how
to do that though in a straight-forward manner so that it is visible at
a first glance. Sure, adding freeform text to the commit message is one
way. Using a SOB chain might work too - even the Acked-by tag - but all
those have another main purpose and are being repurposed for annotating
the fact that a patch is the result of more than one author's thought
process.
IOW, in case I'm not missing anything, we don't really have a way to
denote a multiple authorship, correct? And we should...
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
General Managers: Alberto Bozzo, Andrew Bowd
Registration: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists