linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110421085124.4a44d048.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 08:51:24 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Ranganathan Desikan <ravi@...ztechnologies.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	arvino55@...il.com, bluesmoke-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for April 21 (i82975x_edac)

On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:20:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Changes since 20110420:


on i386:

drivers/edac/i82975x_edac.c:298: warning: integer constant is too large for 'unsigned long' type

which is:

	if (info->xeap & 1)
		page |= 0x100000000ul; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

but page is unsigned long (32 bits), while 0x100000000ul is more than 32 bits,
so that line isn't setting a bit in <page>.  Is it a bug, or this driver isn't
applicable to X86_32, or what?


thanks,
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/