[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110421155832.GU16484@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:58:32 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
jmorris@...ei.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SMACK: Add missing rcu_read_lock/unlock for process capability walk.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 05:47:40PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 4/20/2011 5:08 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >> The global list, yes. The task specific list, no. Modifying the local
> >> list is like any other modification of the cred structure and requires
> >> the cred be copied.
> > But you still need to free it eventually right? And that freeing will
> > need RCU on the reader.
>
> Entries are never freed from the global list. Someone is working
> on a patch to do that, but is running into - wait for it - locking
> issues.
Then why do you use rcu_read_lock() at all?
You can drop all the rcu_read_lock()s and probably the other *_rcu
list accesses then. And my patch is indeed not needed.
> Entries on the local lists are only freed when the task exits.
You mean the last user of the cred?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists