[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303403847.4025.11.camel@mulgrave.site>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 11:37:27 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to
expand_upwards
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:16 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > This should fix the remaining architectures so they can use CONFIG_SLUB,
> > but I hope it can be tested by the individual arch maintainers like you
> > did for parisc.
>
> ia64 and mips have CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP and it initialize
> N_NORMAL_MEMORY automatically if my understand is correct.
> (plz see free_area_init_nodes)
>
> I guess alpha and m32r have no active developrs. only m68k seems to be need
> fix and we have a chance to get a review...
Actually, it's not quite a fix yet, I'm afraid. I've just been
investigating why my main 4 way box got slower with kernel builds:
Apparently userspace processes are now all stuck on CPU0, so we're
obviously tripping over some NUMA scheduling stuff that's missing.
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists