lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:00:39 -0400
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: Export pci device msi table via sysfs

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:10:41PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 02:57:47PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > b) msi_table - populated only if msi(x) is enabled, it lists the irqs allocated
> > to the pci device
> 
> You're not the first one to try this ... the problem is, you can easily
> overflow a single 4k page.  A device can have up to 2k MSI-X entries,
> and we might take up to 5 bytes for each one, so we'd need a 10k buffer.
> 
Yeah, I was a bit worried about that - but I didn't think any sane device would
allocate en entire 2048 irqs (not that thats an excuse).  I had considered doing
an export format like local_cpulist where consecutive irq allocations are listed
as first-last, which would save space and keep us inside a page.  Thoughts?

> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> > +static ssize_t msi_list_show(struct device *dev,
> > +			struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> > +	struct msi_desc *entry;
> > +	int first, last;
> > +	ssize_t count = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!(pdev->msi_enabled || pdev->msix_enabled))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(entry, &pdev->msi_list, list)
> > +		count += sprintf(&buf[count], "%d ", entry->irq);
> > +
> > +	return count;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> 
> The fundamental problem is that the way Linux uses MSI-X is completely
> bollocks.  I've got a few hours to myself on a plane coming up in six
> weeks, and I hope to rewrite it then (I've already written my talk, so
> what else am I going to do?  :-)
> 
Fair enough, I assume when you say 'it' you are referring to (or including) the
way the sysfs attributes are exported, so that we can use seq_file more
flexibly, and break the page limitation?

Regards
Neil

> -- 
> Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
> operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
> a retrograde step."
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ