[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104211500170.5741@router.home>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:02:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: make expand_downwards symmetrical to
expand_upwards
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, David Rientjes wrote:
> I think we may want to just convert slub (and the memory controller) to
> use N_HIGH_MEMORY rather than N_NORMAL_MEMORY since nothing else uses it
> and the generic code seems to handle N_HIGH_MEMORY for all configs
> appropriately.
In 32 bit configurations some architectures (like x86) provide nodes
that have only high memory. Slab allocators only handle normal memory.
SLAB operates in a kind of degraded mode in that case by falling back for
each allocation to the nodes that have normal memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists