linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH V3 4/4] cpuidle: Single/Global registration of idle states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DAFB847.50404@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Apr 2011 10:23:27 +0530
From:	Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
CC:	arjan@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, lenb@...nel.org,
	venki@...gle.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, len.brown@...el.com,
	davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [RFC PATCH V3 4/4] cpuidle: Single/Global registration
 of idle states



On 04/20/2011 11:03 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Trinabh Gupta<trinabh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>  writes:
>
>> With this patch there is single copy of cpuidle_states structure
>> instead of per-cpu. The statistics needed on per-cpu basis
>> by the governor are kept per-cpu. This simplifies the cpuidle
>> subsystem as state registration is done by single cpu only.
>> Having single copy of cpuidle_states saves memory. Rare case
>> of asymmetric C-states can be handled within the cpuidle driverand
>> architectures such as POWER do not have asymmetric C-states.
>
> I haven't actually tested this series on OMAP yet, but it currently
> doesn't compile.

Hi Kevin,

Yes, I tested it only for x86 (as I had mentioned in the description
of the patch series). I just wanted to get comments on the design
and understand how it affects various architectures in question. It
looks to me as if the design should be okay and infact better for
architectures like ARM since they do not have different idle
states for different cpus and thus do not require per-cpu registration.
Global registration would work and be simpler; please correct me if I am
wrong.

>
> The patch below (on top of your series) is required to compile on OMAP,
> I think it's doing what you intended, but please confirm.

Thanks for helping with this.

-Trinabh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/