linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] gma500: add the ability to request backed space or not

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110421050544.GA5832@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2011 22:05:44 -0700
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...ux.jf.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] gma500: add the ability to request backed space or
 not

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:21:08PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:31:17 -0700
> Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 03:27:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > We will will need this for doing a GEM allocator. It should also avoid any
> > > crashes with the current code if the stolen area is too small.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > What tree did you make this against?
> 
> Against -next and the previous patches I sent you. Have you been
> stripping white space automatically again. That will break follow up
> patches if so.

No, I have not stripped any more whitespace since the first problems
that this caused on the driver.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/