lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110422133118.48c0933e@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:31:18 +0100
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of
 ->siglock

On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:45:38 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:

> No functional changes, preparation to simplify the review of the next change.
> 
> 1. We can read current->block lockless, nobody else can ever change this mask.
> 
> 2. Calculate the resulting sigset_t outside of ->siglock into the temporary
>    variable, then take ->siglock and change ->blocked.
> 
> Also, kill the stale comment about BKL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>

Thanks for that updated comment about not being able to change
->blocked from irq context!

Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ