[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110422133118.48c0933e@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:31:18 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <nyoushchenko@...sta.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] signal: sigprocmask: narrow the scope of
->siglock
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:45:38 +0200
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> No functional changes, preparation to simplify the review of the next change.
>
> 1. We can read current->block lockless, nobody else can ever change this mask.
>
> 2. Calculate the resulting sigset_t outside of ->siglock into the temporary
> variable, then take ->siglock and change ->blocked.
>
> Also, kill the stale comment about BKL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Thanks for that updated comment about not being able to change
->blocked from irq context!
Reviewed-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...ux.intel.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists