[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim8mBo3fz9f=quABj-=ycpA+G7q1g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 12:52:55 -0300
From: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
To: John Reiser <jreiser@...wagon.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 01/11] ftrace/trivial: Clean up recordmcount.c to use
Linux style comparisons
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:09 PM, John Reiser <jreiser@...wagon.com> wrote:
> I consider "0==strcmp(" to be an idiom. Too often "strcmp(...) == 0"
> overflows my mental stack because of the typographic width of the operands
> in the source code. If you still object in this case then please consider
> using something like:
> #define strequ(a,b) (strcmp((a), (b)) == 0)
> or
> static int strequ(char const *a, char const *b)
> {
> return strcmp(a, b) == 0;
> }
> which names the idiom.
>
Maybe str_eq? Or even just streq? And also just !strcmp(a,b).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists