[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1303504929.4865.4.camel@laptop>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:42:09 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Kleen, Andi" <andi.kleen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: perf_events: questions about cpu_has_ht_siblings() and offcore
support
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 15:46 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> perf stat -e offcore_response_0:dmd_data_rd,offcore_response_0:dmnd_rfo ......
>
> This should still not be allowed.
Aside from the problem you mention, I don't like the whole
offcore_response_[01] thing. The offcore things are fully symmetric so
the kernel should automatically select the other one if one is taken.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists