linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] export kernel call get_task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110422224308.GA301@suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:43:08 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, suhail.ahmed@...el.com,
	christophe.guerard@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] export kernel call get_task_comm().

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 03:35:44PM -0700, james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> This allows drivers who call this function to be compiled modularly.
> Otherwise, a driver who is interested in this type of functionality
> has to implement their own get_task_comm() call, causing code
> duplication in the Linux source tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>

I think the goal is for the cleanup to happen now, to justify the
addition of the exported symbol.  Without that, there is no need to
export the symbol now at all, as who knows when your driver will be
accepted.

Or, just wait and make it part of your driver patch series, like you did
before, no need to get it accepted now, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/